I just finished reading Virginia Giuffre's memoir and I am absolutely devastated, to say the least. Now I have more questions than answers, especially as it pertains to her relationship with her husband and the last four months of her life.
It sounds to me like he was the last person in a long line of those close to her, to betray her and the effect must have been devastating on her. He seems to have used and abused her (did anyone see the pictures of her at the hospital after he got through with her)? And then HE got a retraining order against HER, so she was unable to see her children for four months before she died. Now he can have a nice life with her hard fought for money after he hounded her to commit suicide. Is Australia doing anything to investigate his actions?
I am equally as upset after reading her memoir. This poor woman, who was abused her whole entire life at the hands of men who did not deserve her trust! The last betrayal by her husband is equally unforgivable.
It’s quite obvious there is something implicating Trump in the”Epstein files”. Why would they be fighting so hard to keep them unreleased if there wasn’t. So let’s be clear, transgender people are a threat to children but known pedophiles aren’t? Why can’t the GOP get a consistent position on issues? The victims need to start naming names.
Transgender people have been upgraded to “corrosive to society.” (SCOTUS, Orr vs Trump case, presidential order regarding historical/birth sex on passport.)
Well where did Epstein live at the time he was such a pal of the MelonFelon? Surely there are state laws that might have been broken. FL would be hopeless, but what about NY?
Agreed, 100%. We need Letitia James to meticulously investigate, which hopefully leads to an airtight prosecution and conviction of the rapist-in-chief. State violation, State conviction, not subject to Federal mocking of justice and the foregone self-pardon trump would grant himself.
I hope you aren't taking at face value the statement by Karoline Levitt that the redacted victim in the email is Giuffre.
How would they know? And how convenient: (a) she's written a memoir that apparently makes no reference to spending hours at Epstein's house with Trump; (b) she's one of very few victims whose names have become public, which makes her the top candidate for a presumptive identification whether or not there is any basis for that; and (c) she's dead and can't testify. So if they implant in everybody's head the conviction that Epstein was referring to Giuffre in this email, they manufacture out of thin air a basis for plausible deniability on Trump's part.
Commentators had better be very clear about what we actually know about the name behind that thick black line.
Unless the files are released or leaked. If that happens, Maxwell has no further hold on Jabba. In that case, Maxwell should enjoy her current comfy digs while she can.
Even if the felon didn’t abuse any of the Epstein victims himself, I think he knows much more than he is saying. Knowing about it but not doing anything about it makes him just as guilty because he knows a heinous crime is happening to a bunch of young girls and young women. He should be in the clink. Terminating a friendship with someone doing something unethical or criminal is one thing but not reporting it to police is another.
It’ll be interesting to see what Trump does with regard to Maxwell. He appears to be damned either way, but then again, he’s a master at deflection and delay. This is a scene out of the movies where the hunted’s options are running thin and the hunter continues, paced with the eerie sound of whistling. I’m out of popcorn.
I just finished reading Virginia Giuffre's memoir and I am absolutely devastated, to say the least. Now I have more questions than answers, especially as it pertains to her relationship with her husband and the last four months of her life.
It sounds to me like he was the last person in a long line of those close to her, to betray her and the effect must have been devastating on her. He seems to have used and abused her (did anyone see the pictures of her at the hospital after he got through with her)? And then HE got a retraining order against HER, so she was unable to see her children for four months before she died. Now he can have a nice life with her hard fought for money after he hounded her to commit suicide. Is Australia doing anything to investigate his actions?
As I've said, many more questions than answers.
I am equally as upset after reading her memoir. This poor woman, who was abused her whole entire life at the hands of men who did not deserve her trust! The last betrayal by her husband is equally unforgivable.
Lest we forget, however, silence is complicity. Ask the Catholic Church.
It’s quite obvious there is something implicating Trump in the”Epstein files”. Why would they be fighting so hard to keep them unreleased if there wasn’t. So let’s be clear, transgender people are a threat to children but known pedophiles aren’t? Why can’t the GOP get a consistent position on issues? The victims need to start naming names.
Pedophiles are only bad when they are liberals or Democrats, in the MAGAverse.
Transgender people have been upgraded to “corrosive to society.” (SCOTUS, Orr vs Trump case, presidential order regarding historical/birth sex on passport.)
Well where did Epstein live at the time he was such a pal of the MelonFelon? Surely there are state laws that might have been broken. FL would be hopeless, but what about NY?
My thought exactly
Agreed, 100%. We need Letitia James to meticulously investigate, which hopefully leads to an airtight prosecution and conviction of the rapist-in-chief. State violation, State conviction, not subject to Federal mocking of justice and the foregone self-pardon trump would grant himself.
I hope you aren't taking at face value the statement by Karoline Levitt that the redacted victim in the email is Giuffre.
How would they know? And how convenient: (a) she's written a memoir that apparently makes no reference to spending hours at Epstein's house with Trump; (b) she's one of very few victims whose names have become public, which makes her the top candidate for a presumptive identification whether or not there is any basis for that; and (c) she's dead and can't testify. So if they implant in everybody's head the conviction that Epstein was referring to Giuffre in this email, they manufacture out of thin air a basis for plausible deniability on Trump's part.
Commentators had better be very clear about what we actually know about the name behind that thick black line.
Forget the DoJ for now. Is there a state where this conspiracy took place that can bring state charges?
Unless the files are released or leaked. If that happens, Maxwell has no further hold on Jabba. In that case, Maxwell should enjoy her current comfy digs while she can.
They're worried about leaks if Trump did his extortions with Bobert and company in the sitroom.
LOL! Leaked anyway, didn't it?
Even if the felon didn’t abuse any of the Epstein victims himself, I think he knows much more than he is saying. Knowing about it but not doing anything about it makes him just as guilty because he knows a heinous crime is happening to a bunch of young girls and young women. He should be in the clink. Terminating a friendship with someone doing something unethical or criminal is one thing but not reporting it to police is another.
It’ll be interesting to see what Trump does with regard to Maxwell. He appears to be damned either way, but then again, he’s a master at deflection and delay. This is a scene out of the movies where the hunted’s options are running thin and the hunter continues, paced with the eerie sound of whistling. I’m out of popcorn.