11 Comments
User's avatar
BayStater16's avatar

If you are relying on the likes of Gorsuch and Barrett, you have already lost the battle.

Expand full comment
Josh Levs-They Stand Corrected's avatar

I hear you! As I here, it's ironic. But here we are. For more on this disastrous Supreme Court:

https://theystandcorrected.substack.com/p/does-america-stand-for-truth

Expand full comment
Arkansas Blue's avatar

That's definitely true for Gorsuck, but Barrett seems to listen to her inner voice of late.

Expand full comment
Michelle Jordan's avatar

Coney-Barrett is standing on the side of the law not Trump’s latest fascist whim.

Expand full comment
Josh Levs-They Stand Corrected's avatar

Let's hope she continues to. It's pathetic to have to hope for this, but under our democratic system, this is how it works!

Expand full comment
Robert Lastick's avatar

I am not to very sure of that.

Expand full comment
Robert Lastick's avatar

Simply put, we need to get Trump OUT of the White House and get him indicted and sued on as many charges as can be secured, and we need it to happen NOW!

Expand full comment
Josh Levs-They Stand Corrected's avatar

Thanks to the folks at The Contrarian for publishing this. For more on the mess Trump's team is making of things, check out: https://theystandcorrected.substack.com/p/trump-storm-and-helicopters

Expand full comment
MF Brady's avatar

What country before ever existed a century and half without a rebellion? And what country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon and pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is its natural manure.

(Thomas Jefferson, in a letter dated November 13, 1787, to William Stephens Smith, the son-in-law of John Adams,)

Expand full comment
Marliss Desens's avatar

The conservative justices often reach decisions based on abstract reasoning, as if it were all a theoretical argument. (Take the Presidential Immunity decision, please.) However, I am hoping that as some of them are seeing the real-live consequences, they may begin to actually consider those in future rulings. After all, a president with immunity can take out the Supreme Court with impunity.

Expand full comment
Stuyvesant Bearns's avatar

Those who wrote our Constitution, and those who guded the many amenments to it, were always making a gamble: Life Tenure.

It is that which backs up Feveral judges of honor and courage to stand in the way of would be dictators.

I believe they will continue to do that.

Expand full comment