140 Comments
User's avatar
Patr's avatar

We know that this will eventually reach the Supreme Court, and hopefully the “justices” will grow a pair and follow the constitution, unless musk & company have bought them off too.

Expand full comment
Kevin Crawford's avatar

It is likely that, like me, the only reason Donald Trump is an American citizen is that we were both born here. We are birthright citizens.

Expand full comment
Epictetus's avatar

And in all probability your parents were American citizens too. Which means that no matter where you happened to be born you would still be an American citizen at birth. You are not a birthright citizen, you would be a citizen no matter where you were born.

Expand full comment
Samuel L Kent's avatar

"Facts" really assumptions, not in evidence.

Expand full comment
Bill Katz's avatar

This is much to do about nothing. This is a 14th amendment right. It’s sacrosanct. As much as I disagree with it, and I disagree with it because it has outlived its usefullness. It was enacted to protect the formerly enslaved from being sent to Africa. Today, it’s being abused by any woman who wants a foot in the American door and time her baby to pop out here. We have real big issues ahead of us. Wait until Medicare and Medicaid is reduced. Wait till your Social Security checks are reduced. Wait till the massive tax cuts made in 2017 for the wealthy are renewed. Wait until every move he makes to increase his God Damn fricken wealth for his billionaire Cabinet. But birthright citizenship? Are you kidding? Save your ammo for the real sheet about to hit the fan.

Expand full comment
Clara's avatar

And who do you think helps fund Medicaid, Medicare, and Social Security? There are plenty of immigrants who pay in to a system that they can never benefit from.

Expand full comment
D. Charlene Magana's avatar

That is true. There are many immigrants who pay into Social Security who will not be able to use it.

Expand full comment
Samuel L Kent's avatar

Taxation without representation.

Expand full comment
Fran Higson's avatar

l

Expand full comment
Joan Tindell's avatar

Bill, I submit that you have your priorities reversed. Yes, an attack on Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security will be an affront, but allowing a president to get away with unilaterally amending the Constitution would be the biggest "sheet" ever to hit the fan.

Expand full comment
I Hate this Timeline's avatar

Bill. When a dictator wannabe moves against the constitution fighters fight. I disagree with you that this part of the constitution should be revised, but even if I agreed there is power in responding and not accepting unconstitutional decrees.

Expand full comment
Bill Katz's avatar

I said it was sacrosanct no need to spend so much energy.

Expand full comment
Elle's avatar

There was extensive precedent for Roe v. Wade, and that got overturned. Yes, I am aware that wasn't a Constitutional amendment.

But you place a great deal of unwarranted faith in the fidelity of the current majority on the SCOTUS.

Expand full comment
Epictetus's avatar

Well, there are only nine justices and Trump appointed three of them.

Expand full comment
Elle's avatar

Yes, and he'll probably appoint more during this term.

Expand full comment
Patr's avatar

Maybe that’s the problem in America. Don’t expend too much energy, let the powers that be take care of it, only now, it’s evident that wrong decisions are being made.

Expand full comment
Kat Hudy's avatar

I will expend as much energy as want to people who talk about revising our Constitution without a vote frim the people. A fair vote note run by Elrond Musk.

Expand full comment
John Daschbach's avatar

There is extensive legal work supporting the Trump EO. Decisions before the 1898 Won Kim Ark ruling supported the view in the Trump EO. With this SCOTUS I'd say it is 50/50 that it is upheld.

Expand full comment
Stewart Gooderman O.D.'s avatar

Except birth rates are down among white women. Our population is aging and we don't have enough bodies to fill positions from those retiring. We need to beef up our educational systems and welcome new people and their children in order to have a viable workforce. So, the 14th has *not* outlived its usefulness.

Expand full comment
Mary's avatar

Thanks for the common sense.

Expand full comment
Bill Katz's avatar

But hold a holy moment. I’m not against immigration. Why to you cast me in that light? I am against illegal immigration. That’s all. But my grandparents came here to Ellis island. I have one of their naturalization papers framed proudly on my wall. You are being unfair to me.

Expand full comment
Meg M's avatar

Bill, do you realize that there is no real way for people from the Southern countries to legally immigrate here? The immigrants to Ellis Island are white Europeans. At some point the white powers agreed to also allow people from Greece and Portugal to come here since they were almost white enough. They went to a lot of trouble to keep the Chinese people who came here to build the railroads from legally staying in the US. And there has never been a normal, legal way for people from South and Central America to come here. If you have a close relative here it could take 20 years for you to join them if you're from the South. For real.

Expand full comment
Bill Katz's avatar

In 1923, Congress passed The Immigration Act on account of too many were coming. Stop understanding this to be racist. The Irish were resoundingly not accepted in the quantity’s that arrived. Same for my people, the Italians and Eastern European Jews. Everyone has gotten the same treatment. Half of my people turned cities into mafia fiefdoms that took decades to eradicate.

Expand full comment
Samuel L Kent's avatar

Did the 1923 immigration act limit immigration of christian Brits, Germans, or other WASP groups?

Expand full comment
Kat Hudy's avatar

Ellis Island Opened in Jan. 1892 & Closed in Nov. 1954. It is a museum now.

Expand full comment
Epictetus's avatar

Well, I was born in 1951 And my mother in 1924 so my Grandparents actually did come through Ellis island. But they were white and spoke English having immigrated from Scotland so there was no one barring them.

Expand full comment
Samuel L Kent's avatar

A shame no one taught you how to spell Epictetus.

Expand full comment
kischmir's avatar

You left out his own kleptomania. A sitting president using the office to increase his own wealth by billions. I can hear George Washington's wooden teeth being ground into sawdust!

Expand full comment
Anca Vlasopolos's avatar

You are a person lacking compassion and historical perspective. This is how a demagogue dictator in the making dismantles the Constitution, as he has done before. You're also a misogynist, given your language about "popping" a baby out. If you had any idea about the birth process, you wouldn't be so foul-mouthed about it.

Expand full comment
Bill Katz's avatar

Just my opinion. Give me a break.

Expand full comment
Anca Vlasopolos's avatar

Why should I? Your opinion ought to be an informed one if you post it for the world to see.

Expand full comment
Bill Katz's avatar

Hum… what’s it called? The Contrarian? Hum…

Expand full comment
Hopeful's avatar

For what it's worth, Bill, I'm ok with your opinion here. Not that I agree with you, but you raise issues that belong on the table. Fidelity to the Constitution is the core issue, not whether birthright citizenship should be conferred automatically.

Expand full comment
Kat Hudy's avatar

These people are renowned journalists. What’s your qualifications?

Expand full comment
Elle's avatar

Your opinion is uninformed, racist, and misogynistic.

"Contrarian" is not synonymous with "jackass." Or with "Y-chromosomal swine."

You can express your opinions about the need for immigration reform without alluding to racist tropes like anchor babies, and crudely inflicting your ignorance regarding the female reproductive system upon other readers by asserting that babies are "popped out."

Furthermore: women of color are STILL frequently denied any pain relief--much less adequate pain management--during childbirth because they are incorrectly thought to be less capable of feeling pain. By OBGYNs!!!

Your opinion is not that of a contrarian, and trying to hide behind that as defense is ignorant and deeply offensive on multiple counts.

Expand full comment
Hopeful's avatar

Flattening the opposition for setting forth perspectives other than one's own is what got us into this mess. Partially. I don't see any reason anyone's views should align with yours or mine. That's because we aren't the same people, don't have the same life experiences, and in fact, don't line up in most ways. It's enough (for me) if someone with some views we don't like will, nevertheless, help us uphold democracy, so democracy survives. Fascism would devastate.

Expand full comment
DR's avatar

Well I don't know about you but there are those who can 'walk and chew gum'. We should fight and take to court any unconstitutional or illegal issue that arises. Save it? That's a defeatist attitude that gets us where we are. Hopeful there are many, many more brave ones out there like these fine lawyers and Contrarian crew that will step in going forward.

Let the people see all the outcomes all the way to supreme court. People have turned their heads for far too long.

Expand full comment
Patr's avatar

It’s not much ado about nothing. Unless you’re an ostrich.

Expand full comment
Bill Katz's avatar

How did you know I was an ostrich?

Expand full comment
Bill Katz's avatar

After reading much on this topic, I’m changing my views on birthright citizenship. I’m not too old to understand the larger picture. As of this juncture, I now support it. Shocking right?

Expand full comment
Belle o' the ball's avatar

Really? " any woman who wants a foot in the American door and time her baby to pop out here" shows up to the US. What a disgusting misogynistic thing to put in print.

You know who does this? Rich foreigners! It's a cottage industry that caters to rich foreign women. Why? Because it's a status symbol. Birth tourists often make significant cash declarations upon entry to the United States. These declarations ranged from several thousand to several hundred thousand dollars. While most cash declarations ranged between $20,000 and $50,000, the TECS narrative for one birth tourist from 2019 reported a $301,400 cash declaration for medical expenses.

These are not your poor families sneaking across the border. Maria and Luis trying to get their kids a better life by crossing the border are not calculating how they can use birthright citizenship to get a foothold in the US. These are wealthy people flying first class. So legislate away at these wealthy birth tourists but that's not a reason to support taking away birthright citizenship.

Expand full comment
Dr. Janice Papedo's avatar

There must be ways to promote more balanced paths to legal immigration. Though I understand a mother’s wish to have their child born in this country, I am aware of abuses of our system. When Hong Kong was about to return to Chinese rule in 1999, many women came here in there last months of pregnancy to have their children born here then returned to China with an American citizen child. It was an industry: housing, food, access to public hospitals. Yet, I can understand the motivation of a mother wishing to better her children. Can we limit abuse of the system in a humane way?

Expand full comment
Bill Katz's avatar

And that is what I have reacted to. Our immigration system is broken. I can easily straddle on this issue.

Expand full comment
Karen Siorek's avatar

Well-said, you make some intelligent points, but it ALL matters. And if this shit show of an adminstration goes after SS and Medicare, look out. Save your ammo is right.

Expand full comment
Kat Hudy's avatar

We will fight those too.

Expand full comment
Phyllis D's avatar

They own at least two. I count on them for nothing. They are a total disgrace. My heart breaks for my daughter and grandchildren.

Expand full comment
Patrick Schelling's avatar

It wouldn't hurt for us to pool resources and by Clarence Thomas a new RV.

Expand full comment
Elle's avatar

I'm not sure an RV meets his minimum bribe requirements anymore. Interesting idea, though. Between Clarence and Virginia, I'm not the sure who repulses me more, after those texts of her actively trying to overturn the election. By rights, SHE should've been charged and convicted. (And subsequently pardoned this week.)

Expand full comment
LBS's avatar

I'm all for funding a one-way ticket to Mars for this guy, his like-minded buddy on the SC, and of course Der Fueher and his Muskrat. Maybe a few more too. Then they can happily build their dream vision of a brave new world and leave us alone.

Expand full comment
Patrick Schelling's avatar

They'll be cowering in little huts to avoid the solar radiation trying to get a few plants to grow. Maybe Muskrat and Der Fuehrer can lose some weight.

Expand full comment
bob yates's avatar

Can we drop the highbrow term "autocracy" please and offer a word that everyone who's ever heard the name of Hitler will recognize, which is "dictatorship"?

Thanks for considering it.

Expand full comment
Helena Handbasket's avatar

Hey, Day One is over! And Trump said he would be a dictator on only Day One!

I mean, he DID say "only" didn't he? And he always keeps his word, doesn't he?

Expand full comment
Hopeful's avatar

And there's the rub.

Expand full comment
Elizabeth's avatar

Thank you, Contrarian, for another powerful update. I’m staying strong, looking towards justice, dignity and the rule of law. Appreciate you all so much.

Expand full comment
JP4M's avatar

I also greatly appreciate our Contrarian. Thank you enormously!

Expand full comment
D. Charlene Magana's avatar

Same here!

Expand full comment
Catherine Winckler's avatar

I needed this today! After reading morose posts last night from researchers and regulators at FDA and NIH who saw the orders yesterday as a death knell for health and science innovation, I was feeling like there were going to be NO bumps on the road to autocracy. Thank you! Keep these stories coming. There is no better motivation to stay involved than seeing success.

Expand full comment
LM Myers's avatar

As an ESL teacher, all these immigrantion policies are pretty important to me, my colleagues, and my students. As a Citizenship Preparation teacher, the 14th Amendment issue is a particularly big deal for me and my students. The intention of course is to freak people out. It works, and as teachers we effort to keep our students on track with their language learning and *legal* citizenship goals.

I would like to also draw attention to the cancellation of the Afghan resettlement and asylum program that was cancelled on Tuesday. There are still individuals (and their family members) who aided the U.S. military that are stuck in Afghanistan or otherwise stranded after America's chaotic withdrawal. The background checks are extensive and time-consuming. It is unconscionable that the US treats people this way after they endangered their lives to assist the U.S. military against the Taliban in their country. And now we have left them high and dry, again. Just unconscionable.

Expand full comment
Dr. Connie Kellogg's avatar

Just learned from Joyce Vance, a few minutes ago that a federal judge in Seattle has issued a nationwide injunction against Trump‘s birthright policy. His illegal unconstitutional birthright policy it looks as though it will go directly to the Supreme Court and I completely believe the Supreme Court will agree that what Trump is doing is unconstitutional if they don’t agree to that, I think it’s time to impeach them

Expand full comment
Bonnie MacEvoy's avatar

Our lawyers are better than their lawyers...

Expand full comment
Victoria Gutowski's avatar

When referring to these Executive Orders, I suggest the authors refer to them to include the words “Project 2025” plan not just Trump. The Heritage Foundation masterminded most of the Executive Orders signed. They should have the blame tacked on them as well.

Expand full comment
Justin Sayne's avatar

What a mess Trump is causing! And, that’s all he EVER does! Why on Earth would ANYBODY pick him for ANY job, let alone the top job in our Country?!

If being born in the USA does NOT make you a US citizen, then NONE of us….including Trump…..are US citizens!

How ridiculous!

However, I fear…..as I must with ALL issues…..what our incompetent Supreme Court will do with this issue. 🤞🙏😱

Expand full comment
Anne-Louise Luccarini's avatar

"Incompetent" Supreme Court? Is THAT what's wrong with them? And they can't be sacked?

Expand full comment
Justin Sayne's avatar

Anne-Louise, “Yes”, because of bias, and, “No”, they can’t be sacked.

Expand full comment
Anne-Louise Luccarini's avatar

Justin, alas, I knew both answers - that was just my way of exposing the facts sarcastically.

Expand full comment
Justin Sayne's avatar

👍!

Expand full comment
D. Charlene Magana's avatar

I am in agreement with everything you said.

Expand full comment
D. Charlene Magana's avatar

Sadly!

Expand full comment
Denise Wallace's avatar

Great post. Although I considered myself informed I am embarrassed to say I had to look up what was LULAC . The Contrarian gives me so much hope. It just feels so good hearing your enthusiasm. Of course anyone who still has their Christmas tree up is my kind of person. Thanks again from the bottom of my heart for all your efforts.

Expand full comment
BBerry's avatar

Anything live tonight? It's been a rough day!

Expand full comment
Laura Wind-Norton's avatar

I want to say this is unbelievable, but I suppose nothing is at this point. I have worked with the sovereign Native nations in my area for years. If they aren't American citizens, then what? I'm sure I don't want to imagine the answer.

Expand full comment
William Powers's avatar

The transcript to this posting begins "This is Jen Rubin at the Contrary Inn."

Spending a few days at the Contrary Inn would be utterly blissful. How do we make reservations?

Expand full comment
Patricia Snyder's avatar

Who are the DOJ attorneys arguing for this unconstitutional action? Just 3 days ago this wasn’t a thing, but now it is? How would these lawyers even have time to prepare for a hearing on this matter, unless they were given already prepared arguments from outside sources. Unreal.

Expand full comment
Linda Poulos's avatar

Thank you 👍🙏

Expand full comment
Mary OReilly's avatar

But it's only temporary !!

Expand full comment
JP4M's avatar

Yes, I also read that it is a temporary halt. That condition worries me.

Expand full comment