Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Virginia McVarish's avatar

Ken Burns is at work on one, to be out later this year, I believe.

Expand full comment
Cecelia Schmieder's avatar

A bit odd to see the American Revolution reduced to being over "taxes" after Rubin's thorough modern-parallel treatment of the Declaration of Independence yesterday. What about exclusionary immigration policies, trade barriers, incompetent/corrupt/immoral appointees, royal self-enrichment, threatening the press, weaponizing justice, etc.?

The Civil War, hmm--until recently, NOT a good example of cinematic embrace of good/evil contrast. So much classic Hollywood output (including the mentioned Gone with the Wind) embrace the traitorous enslavers and cast the Union forces as the bad guys. So much for avoiding wars with problematic enslavers as heroes.

OTOH the 50s did produce some Revolutionary War movies. The Scarlet Coat (1955), directed by John Sturges, is Benedict Arnold spy-vs-spy, heavily fictionalized (including a love triangle). The Devil's Disciple (1959) adapts (or eviscerates) George Bernard Shaw's play--with Burt Lancaster, Kirk Douglas, and Laurence Olivier.

Earlier, in the 30s, Warner Bros made a few surprisingly decent (and well-cast) shorts about the Revolutionary era--the "Old Glory" series, which (I think?) were part of Harry and Jack Warner's anti-Nazi campaign. I've seen them as extras on DVDs. Two examples: Give Me Liberty (1936), Declaration of Independence (1938).

Maybe none of those examples would be "good" by modern or any critical standard. But then, I enjoy a bit of camp, and anyway prefer the old movies with their restful camerawork to modern shaky-cam quick-cut eyestrain. I'll even suffer the old anachronistic women's styling (1950's cinched lift-and-separate silhouettes), over the new men's anachronisms (modern haircuts).

So why is a weirdo like me commenting--sorry about that. Dear. Ms does sound worth a watch.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts