Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Lee Johnson's avatar

Soon after this Avelo Airlines deportation (maybe it is legally human trafficking and/or kidnapping) support "contract" was publicly reported, I sent the following to the Connecticut AG via his website. I also forwarded a similar suggestion to the DAGA (Democratic AGs Association) & included that Avelo operates flights into 14 of their states (CA, CT, DE, DC, IL, ME, MD, MA, MI, NV, NY, NC, OR, & WA). I haven't heard anything back from any of them.

Maybe some pressure on the AGs from residents of those 14 states would stir some action!?!

"Attorney General Tong --

I am not a resident of Connecticut. However, I saw and was impressed by your interview with Rachel Maddow yesterday regarding Avelo Airlines and the expansion of their activities in (& support from) Connecticut State. Their recent announcement of contracting to provide deportation flight services for the Trump regime (my intentional alternative to "administration") understandably raises concerns about the ethics of CT continuing to support Avelo.

As I watched the coverage, I wondered if there is a more powerful approach to this situation that Connecticut (and other states Avelo flies into) could exercise.

As a non-lawyer who is extremely distressed by the many illegal/unconstitutional actions by the Trump regime, a thought (perhaps fantasy, I admit) that spun in my mind was: What legal recourse does state law enforcement have to stop human trafficking conspirators operating out of their jurisdiction? Perhaps seize physical assets within CT that are used in the trafficking operation? Even if the trafficking occurs elsewhere, perhaps state law would allow such action(?). The expensive (prospective) loss of one or more aircraft could be a powerful persuasion to stop Avelo from supporting the "no-due-process" deportations.

What if Connecticut and multiple other state Attorneys General made known that they will follow the ID of aircraft (and other assets) used in "no-due-process" deportations and will consider the possibility of confiscating any such assets present in their jurisdictions? Could persuade a business to revise their plans, I think.

Keep up the good work you described while talking with Rachel Maddow!"

Expand full comment
Michelle Jordan's avatar

I know for sure they operate out of New Haven. That’s why they’re catching hell from the Connecticut AG.

Expand full comment
10 more comments...

No posts