This week’s Democracy Index comes to you securely over Substack — if you were inadvertently added by the team, please remove yourself from the chat.
The cavalier incompetence and dangerousness of Signalgate — the misbegotten episode in which top national security officials discussed war plans over the third-party Signal messaging app, and added an Atlantic journalist to see it all — encapsulates much of the danger we have been tracking. It is foolishness and dangerousness, ineptitude and mendacity, all rolled together.
This scandal reflects broader systemic problems with the Trump Administration’s governance and the state of our democracy. Each of these wrinkles revealed themselves in turn, as the public learned more and the White House reacted.
Foremost was the shocking breach itself, and the use of a third-party app. The National Security Adviser, Mike Waltz, mistakenly added The Atlantic’s editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg to a Signal chat with Trump Administration principals coordinating an attack in Yemen. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, whose previous job was hosting the Fox & Friends weekend show, proceeded to share sensitive war plans, including precise details of the strike.
Waltz’s fumbling fingers could have let anyone into that chat. The White House should feel lucky that he added Goldberg, who displayed more caution and concern for the lives that could be endangered than the principals — by initially withholding information compromising national security or officers. Only after officials insisted that they were not sharing classified information and that there was no reason to worry that any of this had been shared on a non-government-secured app did Goldberg release the full text thread. That does not lessen the reality that our armed forces and the integrity of our national security were one wrong click away from calamity. One immediately wonders how easy it must be for America’s adversaries to penetrate the porous communications of our leaders. Those types of operations, it’s worth noting, have been weaponized against our democracy before. Perhaps more concerning is how this breach will deepen the erosion of trust between the United States and our allies. If our leaders are incapable of safeguarding our own domestic intel, how can we make assurances to other nations that their secrets are safe with us?
Taking after their boss, all of these principals — the Vice President, Secretaries of Defense, State and Treasury; the National Security Adviser — seemed to be avoiding creating government records that would be subject to disclosure laws and archives. Trump’s hostility to record-keeping is notorious. His antipathy toward the sensitivity of national security documents and their proper place under the Presidential Records Act was fully uncovered in the course of the Mar-a-Lago prosecution. Having gotten away with purloining sensitive national security materials in the past, Trump and his associates appear comfortable with blatantly disregarding the necessity of public records-keeping. It’s too early to say whether any laws have been broken, but serious questions must be asked.
Perhaps the most insidious damage this scandal revealed is the absence of accountability. The Attorney General, Pam Bondi, has already indicated she will not investigate.
And why would she? The entire ethos of the Trump White House is that the law does not apply to them; that the Executive is afforded extraordinary protections and powers; and that political actors can influence and pressure supposed law-enforcement officials, such as the Attorney General. Indeed, one of Trump’s first acts in office during his first week was firing the Defense Department’s Inspector General, the independent lawyer who would be tasked with investigating wrongdoing within the Pentagon.
The split-screen this week has been striking: individuals detained without due process deported from the country (including Fulbright Scholars) and frog-marched into El Salvadoran prisons and put on display by DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, as the government’s lies about alleged gang membership unraveled in federal court; and the country’s military leaders imperiled American lives with their recklessness.
Disregard for the livelihoods of Americans extended into people’s health as well this week. As we have documented, the Administration is eviscerating the institutions that keep us healthy. The Administration cut $12 billion worth of funds to key public health infrastructure, as RFK Jr. also announced a massive restructuring of HHS straight out of Project 2025 — with no documented plan, and no justification beyond the slogan “Make America Healthy Again.”
Meanwhile, Trump continues to attack the bedrock of our democracy — elections. This week, he unleashed a new Executive Order that threatens to disenfranchise large swaths of American voters under the guise of election integrity. Many are already questioning the EO’s legality under the Constitution. Fundamentally, subverting the franchise is at the core of the authoritarian project — as Trump has already previewed with his claim that Americans “won’t have to vote anymore.” It’s part of what enables these officials to presume they can act with impunity. Protecting the sacred right to vote may be the most important battle we wage as citizens.
Until next week,
The Democracy Index team
How can anyone remain optimistic in the face of this incredible lawlessness by our king/emperor, aka the orange felon and his string pullers (not just the muskrat)?
The Democracy Index is primarily *descriptive*. It updates readers on actions by the Trump administration to erode American democracy, as well as other damaging actions like Signalgate. It describes WHAT is happening. I'm thankful for this service and the lively writing of this article series. However, let's examine the context a little deeper.
The American Press Association says that "The central purpose of journalism is to provide citizens with accurate and reliable information they need to function in a free society."
https://americanpressassociation.com/principles-of-journalism/
If the role of journalism is to provide the public with the "accurate and reliable information they need to function in a free society," then shouldn't the Democracy Index also provide *prescriptive* information? That would describe WHY Trump is doing what he's doing, so that Americans can see deeper into the truth of the reality they live in and make better decisions on how to stop Trump's behavior, such as by requesting their congressional Republicans to stop supporting Trump's actions and if they don't, voting against them in the midterms.
For example, is Trump a Russian agent? If so, that is an epic journalistic conclusion. It would clearly explain why he's destroying America's economy and democracy, and siding with Russia.
If Trump is an active Russian agent, then all of The Contrarian's stories should have that frame. Such a frame has the potential to turn the tide by turning people against Trump, because they can see the truth. That's the kind of deeper, more important information that the Democracy Index and the Contrarian need to report on.
To help this happen, I've written an article on this topic: "Reframing the Debate: Is Trump an Active Russian agent? Yes he is. And if the public and the press feel that way, we can turn the tide." Please see:
https://analyticalactivist.substack.com/p/reframing-the-debate-is-trump-an